18th November 2022
Managing lateness within a contact centre can be challenging – striking the right balance between fairness to staff and maintaining consistency across departments is key.
One of our community members reached out to our network of industry professionals for insights on this:
“I have been tasked with reviewing the lateness and absence processes for our contact centre and would like to gather insights from others in the industry. We want to be fair to our staff while ensuring a managed and consistent approach across all departments.
What do other contact centres consider as ‘late’? Is it 1 minute, 5 minutes? How many instances of lateness trigger a warning? We’d love to hear what works (or doesn’t work) for others in managing lateness effectively.”
While some contact centres implement a 5-minute grace period, lateness in an interval-based staffing model can still throw off capacity planning. From an operational standpoint, even a slight delay can affect service levels.
Contributed by: Kathleen
A rigid approach to lateness can sometimes backfire. There have been cases where employees won legal disputes over discrepancies in system-tracked login times. It’s crucial to ensure timekeeping methods are accurate to avoid unjust penalties.
Contributed by: Jonathan
Many workplaces log lateness from the first minute for reporting, even if no action is taken initially. A common practice is:
Contributed by: Leon
Encouraging schedule adherence helps maintain operational efficiency. Monitoring lateness during 1-2-1 meetings allows managers to address patterns and guide employees towards improvement.
Contributed by: Richard
The WFM team plays a key role in educating agents on how lateness impacts service levels. Some centres use “file notes” as informal records of lateness, with escalation after three occurrences. This structured yet educational approach helps prevent formal disciplinary action.
Contributed by: Daniel
Instead of punitive measures, consider engaging employees in the scheduling process:
Contributed by: Chris
Building a culture of punctuality is more effective than enforcing strict policies. Suggestions include:
Contributed by: Nilesh
To deter habitual lateness, limiting favourable shifts (e.g., morning shifts) for persistent latecomers can be effective. However, any such action should comply with local labour laws.
Contributed by: Mohamed
A successful method in a 1,000-seat call centre was to link 30% of total incentives to attendance and adherence. Since it required no extra effort from employees, just punctuality, it became a highly effective motivator.
Contributed by: Salman
To improve punctuality, organisations can:
Contributed by: Emil
Before taking disciplinary action, it’s important to first understand why an employee is late. Some may have valid reasons, while others might not realise the impact of their lateness.
Leaders should engage with employees to explore their challenges, motivation, and work environment. Often, small adjustments can help resolve recurring lateness and foster a more supportive workplace.
Contributed by: Cem-Ismail & Richard
To promote accountability, organisations can:
Contributed by: Jo
Since employment laws vary globally, HR should be involved in lateness policies to ensure compliance and fairness. Poorly implemented policies may create legal issues rather than solving attendance challenges.
Contributed by: Jim
Some contact centres define an allowable number of late occurrences per month before escalating actions:
A structured approach prevents inconsistency while ensuring employees understand expectations.
Contributed by: Sheila
This article was made possible due to the great community of experts we have at Call Centre Helper, to get involved just join our LinkedIn Community and and if you aren’t already make sure you are following us on LinkedIn to see our latest content.
For more ways to manage absence in your contact centre, read these articles next:
Reviewed by: Hannah Swankie