12th April 2022
Effectively measuring agent availability is important for understanding and improving contact centre performance.
It helps ensure that agents are being utilized efficiently while also providing insights into how much time they spend waiting for calls.
Accurate measurement of this metric can influence staffing decisions, workload distribution, and overall service levels, making it essential to get the calculation right. But what’s the most accurate way to do this?
So when Scott asked our community of industry professionals about this, we wanted to share the answers with you:
“I’m looking for clarity on how to calculate the % of time an inbound agent is waiting for a call.
We currently use Available Time / Staff Time (logged-in time), but I believe it should be Available Time / (Staff Time – AUX codes) to exclude breaks, meetings, etc., since agents aren’t waiting for calls during those periods.
This would increase availability % but seems more accurate. Is there a standard way to measure this?”
Availability can be calculated using the formula:
Availability = (Available Time ÷ Total Logged-in Time ) × 100
Where:
Suppose an agent is logged into the system for 8 hours (480 minutes) and was available (but not handling calls) for 90 minutes.
Availability = (90 ÷ 480 ) × 100 = 18.75%
This means that the agent was available 18.75% of the time during their logged-in hours.
Contributed by: Chris
I would keep aside the AUX codes related to break – the other AUX codes may need consideration depending upon the purpose of the codes.
For example if the agent is on AUX 2 meant for email handling – then:
Where as if the agent was on AUX 3 ( feedback) then that time should hit your availability
Contributed by: dimitrz
You are right about needing to exclude break time etc. You will also need to exclude wrap up time.
But you also need to ensure that wrap up time is connected with the previous call. It is not for going to the loo, getting a cup of tea etc.
It’s essential to account for various factors that can affect the accuracy of your measurements, such as shift length, break times, and system idle time.
Ensure that you are using the total logged-in time for the relevant shift or time period.
Exclude any time that agents are on breaks or in non-available states like “lunch” or “training” from the total logged-in time.
Sometimes systems automatically mark agents as available even when they’re not actively waiting. Ensure accuracy by validating the statuses being recorded.
Contributed by: Jonty
Given that Available time is the definition of the time an agent is logged in and available for calls (i.e. not actually on a call or in wrap) then this is about measuring the efficiency of the centre, not of the agent.
High availability means agents waiting a long time for calls and thus overstaffing; low availability means a likely degraded service level and agents taking calls in very quick succession.
Whilst it is correct to say that an agent could theoretically be available for 100% of the time, this just means that for the limited time they were logged in to take calls that they didn’t take any. That’s an issue that the Resource Planners need to face up to, not the agent.
Contributed by: Scott
I think you need to separate the call activity from the administrative activity
Determine when your agents receive calls and make a # available to service the calls whilst the rest of the team action the complaints.
You could also do a rotating schedule to ensure all agents get to do admin as well as service calls
Contributed by: Lucrecia
Occupancy is indeed opposite to availability, and this is the occupancy formula:
Occupancy (percentage) = (the total amount of time that an agent is taking calls or contacts + after call work) / (the total amount of time that they are logged in to the ACD system)
Contributed by: Jonty
This article was made possible due to the great community of experts we have at Call Centre Helper, to get involved just join our LinkedIn Community and and if you aren’t already make sure you are following us on LinkedIn to see our latest content.
For more great articles on similar topics, read these next:
Reviewed by: Robyn Coppell