2nd March 2015
Data comes in all shapes and sizes; you could classify it in a hundred and one different ways: categorical, ordinal, Boolean, composite… Here a couple of the less technically challenging – read eye-rollingly dull – categories:
Opinions are what people think, so opinions are important.
Observations, however, are hard to dispute, they are measurable and quantifiable.
Output data shows the result, it is unequivocal. If you really want to know what happened, measure the output, it will tell you the result.
Inputs are what caused the result, they show how it came about. But input data isn’t perfect, it only indicates what might happen, and it isn’t totally reliable.
Inputs and outputs, observations and opinions, they all have their place. but if you want to understand, predict and maybe change the future is there a clear winner?
Observations change before opinions do. You might well be delivering the tastiest pizzas or giving the best service…. but it will take a while before your customers cotton on to the fact and let their opinions change. Opinions are slow to develop.
Likewise, inputs change before outputs do. (I won’t go on to explain that one, even I am not that condescending — well not often.)
If you want to know what will happen next then input-observations will beat output-opinions hands down every time.
Something that is worth thinking about next time you run a customer survey and are unhappy with the result.
The future is already here – it’s just not evenly distributed ~ William Gibson