11th December 2013

In the third of a series of quick insights, Mats Rennstam of Bright shares tips on achieving better performance.
We recently compared contact centre performance to several standard industry benchmarking reports.
We noted three general drivers behind the better performing companies:
The top performers all have a number of things in common:

The graph here shows our clients’ Self-Service Levels being higher than non-clients.
Is a higher level of self-service good, though? Yes, as long as it has a user-centred design and customers have the option to speak to a live agent; we see a correlation between high self-service levels and customer satisfaction. For simple queries, customers prefer fast and easy-to-use self-service solutions.

Despite more complex calls being handled due to higher self-service levels, and most organisations throwing out AHT as a target for advisors, call duration is still a management metric that can be used to lower costs. If you mix your productivity stats with customer satisfaction scores, you can do this without risking a backlash in CSAT.
The graph below shows an example of comparing call duration and product knowledge (as scored by customers) giving the contact centre manager a much better idea of who the true best advisors are, the ones that are efficient AND score high with customers.
