SLA and Abandon Formulas In Erlang

Confused person with questions
Page Views

Written by Jonty Pearce

SLA and Abandon Formulas In Erlang

I have a question regarding SLA and ABN formulas in Erlang.

I try to get the expected service level and abandon level for a day, with 30 minute breakdown. Therefore, I calculate both values by using Erlang for every interval. I get the total amount of calls in SL and Abandoned.

But my question is, does SLA formula have into account abandon?

Example. In a 30 minute interval, I expect to have 50 offered calls. I have 9 agents scheduled. The SLA is 80/20 and AHT 240 secs.

What I get is 74,2% SL (37 calls in SL) and 7,3% ABN (4 abandoned calls)

So, the composition for that interval would be:

50 offered calls

4 abandoned calls

37 calls handled before 20 seconds (in SL)

9 calls handled after 20 seconds

Is it correct? Or do I have to apply SLA only for 46 call (50 offered – 4 abandoned)? SLA formula is considering that there will be 4 abandoned calls?

I appreciate you help.

Question asked by Carlos

SLA and Abandon Come From Two Formulas

SLA and Abandon come from two formulas – you should read this article: A Beginner’s Guide to the Erlang A Formula

The Erlang Calculator works out the SLA on the calls offered, not the calls abandoned.

The problem is that if you work on , for example 46 calls (50 offered, 4 abandoned) then this would lead to understaffing, which is already a major headache for the industry.

With thanks to Jonty

Author
Jonty Pearce

Jonty Pearce walked into his first call centre in 1989 and has been hooked ever since. He founded Call Centre Helper in 1989.

He is an Engineering Graduate with a background in marketing and publishing. In 2020 he won the AOP Digital Publishing Award for The Best Use of Data.

He writes and speaks on a wide variety of subjects - particularly around forecasting and scheduling. His in depth knowledge of forecasting algorithms has earned him the nickname "Mr Erlang."

Connect with Jonty on LinkedIn

Read more by Jonty Pearce

Reviewed by: Megan Jones